On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Sean Farley <sean at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> Jed, could this be the mismatch between SuperLU and the new ParMetis? >> > > Looking at his configure line, I don't see --download-metis, which would > mean that he isn't using the new parmetis. Also, he didn't compile > --with-64-indices, so he's not using any of the custom patch for > SuperLU_DIST. > So there would not be the problem with empty domains? I could see it happening for this many processes. Matt -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20111127/fc08fd79/attachment.htm>
