On Fri, 20 Jan 2012, Dominik Szczerba wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > > On Fri, 20 Jan 2012, Dominik Szczerba wrote: > > > >> > 2) Dominik, I have pushed a possible fix for this to petsc-dev. Can you > >> > try > >> > running with that on this machine? > >> > >> There is no mercurial on the system. Is your fix already in the tarball? > > > > you can download the patch from here - and apply as before with the patch > > command. [Note: get the 'raw' patch] > > Please explain the 'raw' part.
http://petsc.cs.iit.edu/petsc/BuildSystem/rev/39eccbe256d3 shows the patch in html. However there is a link on this page with the text 'raw' If you click on that - you get plain text patch - that can be applied with 'patch command' http://petsc.cs.iit.edu/petsc/BuildSystem/raw-rev/39eccbe256d3 Ig uess I should have just sent the 'raw' link - but figured the html link had more utility [as its more browsable] - so listed the html link to the patch. You can browse all petsc-dev changes at: http://petsc.cs.iit.edu/petsc/petsc-dev/ http://petsc.cs.iit.edu/petsc/BuildSystem/ Satish
