Ah yes, thanks, no, I would not apply a html formatted patch with line numbers :)
Thanks, Dominik On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > On Fri, 20 Jan 2012, Dominik Szczerba wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Satish Balay <balay at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: >> > On Fri, 20 Jan 2012, Dominik Szczerba wrote: >> > >> >> > 2) Dominik, I have pushed a possible fix for this to petsc-dev. Can you >> >> > try >> >> > running with that on this machine? >> >> >> >> There is no mercurial on the system. Is your fix already in the tarball? >> > >> > you can download the patch from here - and apply as before with the patch >> > command. [Note: get the 'raw' patch] >> >> Please explain the 'raw' part. > > http://petsc.cs.iit.edu/petsc/BuildSystem/rev/39eccbe256d3 > > shows the patch in html. However there is a link on this page with the > text 'raw' > > If you click on that - you get plain text patch - that can be applied > with 'patch command' > > http://petsc.cs.iit.edu/petsc/BuildSystem/raw-rev/39eccbe256d3 > > > Ig uess I should have just sent the 'raw' link - but figured the html > link had more utility [as its more browsable] - so listed the html > link to the patch. > > You can browse all petsc-dev changes at: > http://petsc.cs.iit.edu/petsc/petsc-dev/ > http://petsc.cs.iit.edu/petsc/BuildSystem/ > > Satish >
