On Tue, 13 Oct 2015, Barry Smith wrote: > > ref the thing here that happened with my misunderstanding of the purpose of > > that config file. whenever i see a <Package>Config.cmake it is the cmake > > config mode file for <Package>. it did not occur to me that it could be > > anything else, because i have never seen it be anything else in any other > > pieces of software. > > > > Yes, we need to change the name of that. Its very confusing and no longer > > used. > > Satish, > > Can you please change the name of this file so it doesn't cause confusion > in the future. Put something in the name to clearly indicate it is not a > <Package>Config.cmake for people to use. Perhaps > DoNotUseThisInternalToPetscOnlyConfig.cmake
Which do you prefer: PETScCmakeBuild.conf or PETScBuild.cmake At some point - we might want to completely remove the cmake build related code.. Satish
