On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Satish Balay <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2015, Barry Smith wrote: > > > > ref the thing here that happened with my misunderstanding of the > purpose of that config file. whenever i see a <Package>Config.cmake it is > the cmake config mode file for <Package>. it did not occur to me that it > could be anything else, because i have never seen it be anything else in > any other pieces of software. > > > > > > Yes, we need to change the name of that. Its very confusing and no > longer used. > > > > Satish, > > > > Can you please change the name of this file so it doesn't cause > confusion in the future. Put something in the name to clearly indicate it > is not a <Package>Config.cmake for people to use. Perhaps > DoNotUseThisInternalToPetscOnlyConfig.cmake > > Which do you prefer: > > PETScCmakeBuild.conf > or > PETScBuild.cmake > PETScBuildInternal.cmake > At some point - we might want to completely remove the cmake build related > code.. I am for that right now. "There can be only one" Matt > > Satish > -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener
