Hi Karli,

Many thanks for the very swift reply :-) I did indeed look there and it says

Stay tuned via the mailing list
Which is why I subscribed to the slepc mailing list but perhaps it meant *this* mailing list rather than the slepc mailing list?

I can build 3.7 :-) I have just checked out the tag marked 3.6.3 and am trying to build that. I will report back soon.

Once again thanks for responding

Dominic.

On 08/05/2016 09:19, Karl Rupp wrote:
Dear Dominic,

have a look here:
http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/2016-April/029224.html

Best regards,
Karli



On 05/08/2016 10:15 AM, Dominic Steinitz wrote:
Hi Hong,

I too am having compatibility issues. I looked at the git repos.

  v3.7                       PETSc 3.7
  v3.6.4                    PETSc 3.6.4
  v3.6.3                    PETSc 3.6.3
  v3.6.2                    PETSc 3.6.2
  v3.6.1                    PETSc 3.6.1
and

  v3.6.3                    SLEPc 3.6.3
  v3.6.2                    SLEPc 3.6.2
  v3.6.1                    SLEPc 3.6.1
If I just checkout master on both repos, won't I get PETSc 3.7 and SLEPc
3.6.3?

Should I checkout the tag for 3.6.3 on the PETSc repo?

Many thanks, Dominic

BTW I checked https://listas.upv.es/pipermail/slepc-announce/ for
announcements on new versions but nothing has been posted since June 2015.

Marco:
You may use petsc-master and slepc-master.
Hong

Dear All,
>
>   first, let me congratulate and thank the PETSc team and all
> contributors for release 3.7 .
>
> I just noticed that the changes in Options handling introduced in 3.7
> broke the build of the latest SLEPc (3.6.1, since 3.6.3 is flagged as
> incompatible with 3.7).
>
> Is there already a time estimate for a compatible release of SLEPc ?
>
> Thank you and kind regards,
>
> Marco Zocca
>


Reply via email to