Barry Smith <[email protected]> writes: > These results seem reasonable to me. > > What makes you think that KNL should be doing better than it does in > comparison to Haswell? > > The entire reason for the existence of KNL is that it is a way for > Intel to be able to "compete" with Nvidia GPUs for numerics and > data processing, for example in the financial industry. By > "compete" I mean convince gullible purchasing agents for large > companies to purchase Intel KNL systems instead of Nvidia GPU > systems. There is nothing in the hardware specifications of KNL > that would indicate that it should work better on this type of > problem than Haswell, in fact the specifications indicate that the > Haskell should perform better
Boom! Time to rewrite PETSc in Haskell!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
