> On 25 May 2017, at 18:05, Matthew Knepley <knep...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If you want that, is there a reason you cannot use the FEM style FALSE+TRUE? > If you already want the closure, usually the star is not really adding > anything new.
Ok, let me clarify. Given shared facets, I'd like closure(support(facet)) this is a subset of the fem adjacency. "Add in the cell and its closure from the remote rank". This doesn't include remote cells I can only see through vertices. Without sending data evaluated at facet quad points, I think this is the adjacency I need to compute facet integrals: all the dofs in closure(support(facet)). I thought this was what the fv adjacency was, but I think I was mistaken. That is support(cone(p)) for all p that I have. Now I do a rendezvous to gather everything in the closure of these new points. But I think that means I still don't have some cells? Make sense? Lawrence
