On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Lawrence Mitchell < [email protected]> wrote:
> > > On 25 May 2017, at 19:46, Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Sounds like DG. I will get out my dead chicken for the incantation > > Actually no! Mixed H(div)-L2 for Stokes. Which has facet integrals for > partially discontinuous fields. If you do redundant compute for such > terms, you need a depth-2 FEM adjacency, which is just grim. Equally we > have some strange users who have jump terms in CG formulations. Hmm, I thought I made adjacency per field. I have to look. That way, no problem with the Stokes example. DG is still weird. Matt > > Lawrence -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener http://www.caam.rice.edu/~mk51/
