On 22/05/18 02:03 PM, Smith, Barry F. wrote:
Hmm, why would
the resolution with *sequential* symbolic factorisation gives ans err around
1e-6 instead of 1e-16 for parallel one (when it works).
? One would think that doing a "sequential" symbolic factorization won't
affect the answer to this huge amount? Perhaps this is the problem that needs to be
addressed.
I do agree that this is a huge amount of difference... and if we agree
this is also a bug, than it means there are not one but two bugs that
deserve to be fixed...
Thanks,
Eric
