Hi Eric, I am curious if the parallel symbolic factoriation is faster than the sequential version? Do you have timing?
Fande, On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 12:18 PM, Eric Chamberland < [email protected]> wrote: > > > On 22/05/18 02:03 PM, Smith, Barry F. wrote: > >> >> Hmm, why would >> >> the resolution with *sequential* symbolic factorisation gives ans err >>> around 1e-6 instead of 1e-16 for parallel one (when it works). >>> >> >> ? One would think that doing a "sequential" symbolic factorization >> won't affect the answer to this huge amount? Perhaps this is the problem >> that needs to be addressed. >> >> > I do agree that this is a huge amount of difference... and if we agree > this is also a bug, than it means there are not one but two bugs that > deserve to be fixed... > > Thanks, > > Eric > >
