Hello, I actually have a question about the usage of DMDA since I'm quite new to this. I wonder if the DMDA suite of functions can be directly called on vectors created from VecCreate? Or the vectors have to be formed by DMDACreateGlobalVector? I'm also not sure about what the dof and stencil width arguments do.
I'm still unsure about the usage of MatCreateShell and MatShellSetOperation, since it seems that MyMatMult should still have 3 inputs just like MatMult (the matrix and two vectors). Since I'm not forming the matrix, does that mean the matrix input is meaningless but still needs to exist for the sake of this format? After I create such a shell matrix, can I use it like a regular matrix in KSP and utilize preconditioners? Thanks! Yuyun ________________________________ From: petsc-users <[email protected]> on behalf of Yuyun Yang <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2020 3:12 AM To: Smith, Barry F. <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [petsc-users] Matrix-free method in PETSc Thank you, that is very helpful information indeed! I will try it and send you my code when it works. Best regards, Yuyun ________________________________ From: Smith, Barry F. <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2020 10:02 PM To: Yuyun Yang <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [petsc-users] Matrix-free method in PETSc Yuyun, If you are speaking about using a finite difference stencil on a structured grid where you provide the Jacobian vector products yourself by looping over the grid doing the stencil operation we unfortunately do not have exactly that kind of example. But it is actually not difficult. I suggest starting with src/ts/examples/tests/ex22.c It computes the sparse matrix explicitly with FormIJacobian() What you need to do is instead in main() use MatCreateShell() and MatShellSetOperation(,MATOP_MULT,(void (*)(void))MyMatMult) then provide the routine MyMatMult() to do your stencil based matrix free product; note that you can create this new routine by taking the structure of IFunction() and reorganizing it to do the Jacobian product instead. You will need to get the information about the shell matrix size on each process by calling DMDAGetCorners(). You will then remove the explicit computation of the Jacobian, and also remove the Event stuff since you don't need it. Extending to 2 and 3d is straight forward. Any questions let us know. Barry If you like this would make a great merge request with your code to improve our examples. > On Feb 15, 2020, at 9:42 PM, Yuyun Yang <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello team, > > I wanted to apply the Krylov subspace method to a matrix-free implementation > of a stencil, such that the iterative method acts on the operation without > ever constructing the matrix explicitly (for example, when doing backward > Euler). > > I'm not sure whether there is already an example for that somewhere. If so, > could you point me to a relevant example? > > Thank you! > > Best regards, > Yuyun
