This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization.
Barry Smith <bsm...@petsc.dev> writes:
> In my limited understanding of the Fortran iso_c_binding, if we do not provide an equivalent Fortran stub (the user calls) that uses the iso_c_binding to call PETSc C code, then when the user calls PETSc C code directly via the iso_c_binding they have to pass iso_c_binding type arguments to the call. This I consider unacceptable. So my conclusion was there is the same number of stubs, just in a different language, so there is no reason to consider changing since we cannot "delete lots of stubs", but I could be wrong. I don't want users to deal with iso_c_binding manually. We already have the generated ftn-auto-interfaces/*.h90. The INTERFACE keyword could be replaced with CONTAINS (making these definitions instead of just interfaces), and then the bodies could use iso_c_binding to call the C functions. That would reduce repetition and be the standards-compliant way to do this. What we do now with detecting the Fortran mangling scheme and calling conventions "works" but doesn't conform to any standard and there's nothing stopping Fortran implementations from creating yet another variant that we have to deal with manually. I don't know if this change would enable inlining without LTO, though I think the indirection through our C sourcef.c is rarely a performance factor for Fortran users.
