On Monday 03 February 2003 14:14, Daniel Hartmeier wrote: > It's probably the route-to lo0. I agree it shouldn't crash, and I'll fix > it if you can provide a ddb> trace. But what's the intention here? > pfctl should probably prevent route/reply/dup-to loopback interfaces. It > makes no sense to me.
I would like to change TOS value of outgoing packets.
So I'll forward them to localhost where a daemon is binding, altering and
forwarding.
Do you have a working solution for 3.2-stable ?
Thanks.
Ed
