and nat/rdr Stefan Sonnenberg-Carstens Wed, 05 Feb 2003 07:39:31 -0800 Hi all, I recently installed the 3.2-CURRENT snapshot to check out the newest features available in the forthcoming 3.3 release for pf. I noticed the <table> definition to pf rules, but the manpage and the section BNF rules state no possibility for using <table> inside nat/rdr rules. I thought this might be fine for some load balancing, because you could have an external script checking webservers (and load ?) and then adjusting the table accordingly. Is this planned ? Previous message View by thread View by date Next message Re: <table> and nat/rdr Stefan Sonnenberg-Carstens Re: <table> and nat/rdr Cedric Berger Re: <table> and nat/rdr Ryan McBride Reply via email to Search the site The Mail Archive home pf - all messages pf - about the list Expand Previous message Next message The Mail Archive home Add your mailing list FAQ Support Privacy 000b01c2cd2c$475122f0$6904a8c0@hal9000

[Stefan Sonnenberg-Carstens]

Hi all,
I recently installed the 3.2-CURRENT snapshot to check out the newest
features available in the forthcoming 3.3 release for pf.
I noticed the <table> definition to pf rules, but the manpage and the
section BNF rules state no possibility for using <table> inside nat/rdr
rules.
I thought this might be fine for some load balancing, because you could have
an external script checking webservers (and load ?) and then adjusting the
table
accordingly.
Is this planned ?