On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 12:19:30AM -0600, Richard D. Gutery wrote:
> and nothing else (or to be more correct the FIRST GATEWAY address in mygate).
>
> Any suggestions or ideas would be appreciated.
as i'm not in a similar scenario, i don't know if this would be as easy
as the suggestion implies; but what about using like:
table <BothGates> persist { 111.111.111.x 222.222.222.x }
then you could tag each outbound rule you wanted to be subject
to going out either interface, per rule, then at the bottom do
pass out route-to <BothGates> all tagged FORBOTH keep state
i might be missing lots of details, but fwiw, that's one of
the trees i'd try barking up.
jared.
--
[ openbsd 3.3 current/GENERIC ( jul 21 ) // i386 ]
