Monday, October 20, 2003, 7:44:52 PM, Henning Brauer wrote: >> Request to introduce a public revision number to PF and pfctl. HB> no.
HB> I had code doing this, and even pfctl erroring out with a nice message HB> if kernel and userland are out of sync, but theo refused it. That's strange. Why? I mean: That is vital information about the own system. That would save a lot of time for threads like "*whine* syntax error *whine*" when the problem is a version missmatch. Additionally it's a security improvement when I can step up to an old box check the versions and update _if_ required! Can you please tell me: What is the point in _not_ providing such information?! -- Best regards, Max mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
