On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 10:05:58AM +0100, Cedric Berger wrote: > Henning Brauer wrote: > > >that is in practice true for 99% of you. > > > >the state key does not include the interface, but the direction. > >as long as routes do not change that is equivalent to beeing bound to > >the interface. > Yes, for "normal" (i.e. not spoofed) packets.
og cedric, please stop that, this is horribly misleading. you don't get your packet in on the wrong interface until you match the state, and that requires a _lot_ of information (match the sequence number window, for example), taht makes it close to impossible. it's certainly neat that we can bind states to interfaces now, but it is not as if the previous behaviour is a problem.
