On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 07:00:17PM -0700, j knight wrote: > Henning Brauer wrote: > >On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 03:48:36PM -0700, j knight wrote: > >>Henning Brauer wrote: > >>>that is in practice true for 99% of you. > >>>the state key does not include the interface, but the direction. > >>>as long as routes do not change that is equivalent to beeing bound to > >>>the interface. > >>Would you agree then that the behavior of non -current pf is the > >>equivalent of if-bound? > >no, floating. > The implimentation may be closer to floating but the actual behavior, as > you pointed out, is more like if-bound. Would you agree?
mostly. floating didn't change. -- Henning Brauer, BS Web Services, http://bsws.de [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
