On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 09:41:45AM -0000, Peter Galbavy wrote: > Alexey E. Suslikov wrote: > > b) uncomfortableness for people, who wants to have bunch > > of rules "stated" differently from their "state policy" > > default, instead of just constructing more hacking-proofing > > ruleset. > > If I understand correctly, Alexey is asking for a global option for the > default behaviour. This would be neat.
i use this: set state-policy if-bound
