Didn't seem like it makes much difference, I guess with the use of "keep" state, "quick" isn't that useful.
Hsiao-lung On Sunday 08 February 2004 05:47 am, Dom De Vitto wrote: > Absolutely, but PF is so quick it will only really make any difference > speed-wise if you're looking at 100's of rules and only _*if*_ you're > have performance problems currently. > > The real advantage of quick is management, it's easier to read a > ruleset top-down, than bottom up, especially when most of the rules > don't apply. > > Dom > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > Dom De Vitto Tel. 07855 805 271 > http://www.devitto.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > Where do you want to go today? Same as every day.... Windows Update. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Hsiao-lung Chang > Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2004 10:21 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: quick on all pass/block? > > Are there any disadvantages to using quick on all pass/block rules and > reverse the order of all the rules? > > First match seems would be faster than last match... > > Thanks. > Hsiao-lung > -- > Give the gift of knowledge! > http://www.cksf.org/ -- Give the gift of knowledge! http://www.cksf.org/
