[Fwd: Problems with voip and state clashes]

[Tim Pushor]

No ideas?

Even though most are using asterisk behind a nat with simple port 
forwarding, it looks like I am unable to do this with pf. I have grown 
to love pf so much it would be a shame to have to dump it on MY network :-(

Thanks,
Tim


-------- Original Message --------
Subject:        Problems with voip and state clashes
Date:   Sun, 26 Jun 2005 10:55:48 -0600
From:   Tim Pushor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:     PF List <pf@benzedrine.cx>



Hi Friends,

I am having real trouble with PF and Asterisk behind a NAT.

The long and short of it is that I'd really like NAT a subset of 
traffic, without putting the connection in the translation table. That 
is, I want to translate the source ip:port on the outbound, but not 
worry about return traffic (since it is handled by a RDR, hence the clash).

Is that possible?

I know this is short on details, but if theres an easy way to do that, I 
don't need to bore you with them ;-)

Thanks a lot,
Tim