On Wednesday 29 June 2005 11:14 am, Tim Pushor wrote: > The long and short of it is that I'd really like NAT a subset of > traffic, without putting the connection in the translation table. That > is, I want to translate the source ip:port on the outbound, but not > worry about return traffic (since it is handled by a RDR, hence the clash).
I'm not too familiar with asterisk, but why do you need a RDR? Wouldn't the return traffic have a state, and thus be rerouted before it gets to any possible redirects? (I'm looking at an old copy of the pf flow-diagram, I don't know how up-to-date that is)... Maybe if you could give some background on how asterisk works at the IP level, Mike
