I'm the OP, and following up my own posting with the results (and a
small rant).

When I created a new, separate rule that passed UDP and TCP for port 53
only, things appeared to start working, and I see no more blocked
domain traffic. Although I was certain I did exactly this earlier (or
the equivalent), since nothing else changed, I have to assume it was a
case of PEBKAC. It wouldn't be the first time, nor likely the last...

Again, as far as I know the blocked packets I was seeing were always
TCP, since the tcpdump of pflog adds "udp port xxx" to udp packets
going through it and none of the blocked ones I saw had that. But maybe
that's a problem with tcpdump, I don't know.

For everyone who answered civily, and provided thoughtful and helpful
information, my thanks; it's much appreciated. Thanks!

For everyone else who whined like a spoiled child that I hadn't
provided my entire ruleset in the very first posting: get a life. Are
you here just to pump your fragile ego, or to actually answer
questions? I was posting an extremely specific query that related to
whether I was understanding one particular concept properly. I provided
what I thought was the essential information to answer that query
(specifically, the blocked packet and the rule that I thought should
have passed it, in case I was missing something obvious). That seemed
like the polite thing to do, and the most considerate of others' time.
Certainly I always appreciate it when folks post their questions that
way.

If more of my pf.conf would have helped provide an answer, asking
nicely (as Scott, among others, did) would have been appropriate, not
an instant flame. If I had given my whole ruleset right from the start,
I *know* someone would have responded with something like, "get lost,
we're not here to debug your entire configuration for you". (Believe
me, I''ve seen responses exactly like that here before.) Flame those
you think are providing too much information and do the same for too
little - gee, that's really effective advocacy for your OS of choice.

A truism I've found in many fields is that those who are truly secure
in their knowledge are usually the kindest and most tolerant of those
below them; it's those who are insecure - and always less knowledgable
than they want to admit - who need to belittle others.

Reply via email to