I took a pb5.02 application and converted it to 6.5 and the security works ok in a 32
bit environment but could not get the security to work in a 16 bit environment. In
the 16 bit environment the program ran but the security settings were somehow ignored
(exact application). Since we went to a 32bit platform I found with pb6.5 that I
needed to use the cache service or it was too slow on the wide area network even
though it was fine in pb5.02
Joe Powers wrote:
> Hi PFCers,
> I converted a large app from 5.03 to 6.5.00 (Win 95, SQL Anywhere). It
> was using PFC security under 5.03 and working (as well as PFC security
> ever works). With 6.5, when I run the app with a userid who has security
> restrictions, I get "A database error has occurred. Database error code:
> 2, Data truncated." Should I be able to expect the security settings
> that existed in the 5 security tables to work for PB 6.5 or do I need to
> scan the application again. Also, I've had nothing but horrible results
> with the Security Scanner, so I'm hoping to NOT have to rescan the
> application. Does PFC Security Service work at all under 6.5.00???
> Thanks, Joe.
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] HOSTED BY IIGG, INC. FOR HELP WITH LIST SERVE COMMANDS, ADDRESS
> > A MESSAGE TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] WITH THE FOLLOWING MESSAGE: help pfcsig
> > SEND ALL OTHER INQUIRES TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] HOSTED BY IIGG, INC. FOR HELP WITH LIST SERVE COMMANDS, ADDRESS
> A MESSAGE TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] WITH THE FOLLOWING MESSAGE: help pfcsig
> SEND ALL OTHER INQUIRES TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
