I've played with EA Server and am very impressed with what I was able to
accomplish in a very short time with no internet skills whatsoever.
I've been using PB since 3.0 and consider myself proficient with it. I know
next to nothing about Java, Javascript and Corba. I know enough HTML to
make an average (at best) website.
EA Server allowed me to leverage my PB knowledge to write the business
logic. It generated the Javascript for updating forms with the HTML DW. My
basic HTML skills where good enough to create a navigatable web page.
I have not used WebObjects, but if you are confident of your PB knowledge, I
would sit down with EA Server for a week. My guess is that it will knock
anything else out of the running.
D
----- Original Message -----
From: Adams, Rob (London) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2000 5:28 AM
Subject: PFCSIG Webobjects vs EA Server 3.5
> Does anyone have any experience of using either of these application
> servers? I'm interested in rewriting a PB App and, whilst EA Server would
> have many advantages by dint of its use of PB nvo's and datawindows,
Apple's
> WebObjects does look very promising.
>
> Any information gratefully received.
> Cheers,
> Rob
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] HOSTED BY IIGG, INC. FOR HELP WITH LIST SERVE COMMANDS,
ADDRESS
> > A MESSAGE TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] WITH THE FOLLOWING MESSAGE: help
pfcsig
> > SEND ALL OTHER INQUIRES TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] HOSTED BY IIGG, INC. FOR HELP WITH LIST SERVE COMMANDS, ADDRESS
> A MESSAGE TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] WITH THE FOLLOWING MESSAGE: help pfcsig
> SEND ALL OTHER INQUIRES TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
