> -----Original Message----- > From: Rapha�l Enrici [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 04 August 2003 21:14 > To: Andreas Pflug > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Dave Page > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Problem with debian package > version number > > > Andreas Pflug wrote: > > > Rapha�l Enrici wrote: > > > >> I did a big mistake when I began to number debian packages... What > >> are you planning to do concerning the pgAdmin3 version > number for the > >> beta release ? Will this stay 0.8.0 ? Or will this become > something > >> else greater than 0.8.0 (would be nice...) ? Does someone > has an idea > >> of the date this release is planned ? > > > > Hi Rapha�l, > > so far we don't have an agreed schema of numbering, so this is the > > right moment to make proposals and decide. > > IMHO, the first beta will be 0.90, following development versions > > 0.91, the second beta 0.92, ... >
I was intending to follow the pga2 convention: 0.9.0 beta 1 0.9.1 beta 1 dev 1 0.9.2 beta 1 dev 2 ... 0.9.14 beta 2 and so on. We then release 1.0.0. 1.0.1 is refresh 1 of 1.0 1.1.x is the new development branch that will become 1.2.x at release, thus odd minor versions are development, and even are stable. Regards, Dave ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
