Dave Page wrote:I don't think we need to number each between-betas version. We have Betas, which will get their own number, and to distinct non-beta (internal ongoing-work versions) from this they get additional numbers. so we have
I was intending to follow the pga2 convention:
0.9.0 beta 1
0.9.1 beta 1 dev 1
0.9.2 beta 1 dev 2
....
0.9.14 beta 2
0.9.0 beta-1
0.9.1 ongoing work
0.9.2 beta-2
0.9.3 more fixing
...
0.9.6 RC1
0.9.7 minor fixes
0.9.8 RC2
0.9.9 more minor fixes
0.9.10 RC3
0.9.11 even less fixes
....
Ok.
and so on. We then release 1.0.0.
1.0.1 is refresh 1 of 1.0
1.1.x is the new development branch that will become 1.2.x at release, thus odd minor versions are development, and even are stable.
Regards, Andreas
---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
