> -----Original Message----- > From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 09 August 2003 21:56 > To: Raphaël Enrici; Dave Page > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Package naming conventions > > > On Saturday 09 August 2003 21:21, Jean-Michel POURE wrote: > > ANYWAY: I am rebuilding betas with pgadmin3-0.9.0-1.rpm and will > > upload them during the night. It will take me some time > because I have > > to rebuild wxWindows as well. I missed the information to > upgrade to > > 20030722... > > Dear friends, > > Raphaël wrote me that the required wxWindows version was > 20030707, this is OK > for me. To sum up the RPM thing which differs slightlly from Debian: > > 1) CVS snapshots are numbered: > pgadmin3-{version}-cvs{date}.rpm > pgadmin3-0.9.0-cvs20030809.rpm > > 2) FTP uploads are numbered: > pgadmin3-{version}-{build}.rpm > pgadmin3-0.9.0-1.rpm > > Build should be 1, 2, 3, etc... > When you release a new {version}, the {build} goes back to 1. > > Agreed? On your reply, I will rebuild the packages. > Cheers, Jean-Michel
Sounds good to me. Not sure the cvs in the snapshot names is needed, but I don't think it hurts. Regards, Dave. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
