Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Package naming conventions

[Rapha�l Enrici]

Dave Page wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 09 August 2003 21:56
To: Rapha�l Enrici; Dave Page
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Package naming conventions

   

Dear friends,

Rapha�l wrote me that the required wxWindows version was 
20030707, this is OK 
for me. To sum up the RPM thing which differs slightlly from Debian:

Dear Jean Michel,

You were right and I was wrong, it's now 20030722, I'll launch my builds 
tomorrow.

1) CVS snapshots are numbered:
pgadmin3-{version}-cvs{date}.rpm
pgadmin3-0.9.0-cvs20030809.rpm
2) FTP uploads are numbered:
pgadmin3-{version}-{build}.rpm
pgadmin3-0.9.0-1.rpm
Build should be 1, 2, 3, etc...
When you release a new {version}, the {build} goes back to 1.
Agreed? On your reply, I will rebuild the packages.
Cheers, Jean-Michel
   

Sounds good to me. Not sure the cvs in the snapshot names is needed, but I don't think it hurts.
 

It's ok for me and really near from what is done on Debian, I like it 
:). Dave, the cvs information can have its importance when the package 
is found in an official distro, to distinguish the build from a fully 
"stable" one. I  found quite a lot of package versioned like that in 
debian and think it's easy to read and as you said it doesn't hurt.

Cheers,

Rapha�l





---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
     joining column's datatypes do not match