Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Package naming conventions

[Raphaël Enrici]

Dave Page wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: Jean-Michel POURE [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 09 August 2003 21:56
To: Raphaël Enrici; Dave Page
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Package naming conventions

   

Dear friends,

Raphaël wrote me that the required wxWindows version was 
20030707, this is OK 
for me. To sum up the RPM thing which differs slightlly from Debian:

Dear Jean Michel,

You were right and I was wrong, it's now 20030722, I'll launch my builds 
tomorrow.

1) CVS snapshots are numbered:
pgadmin3-{version}-cvs{date}.rpm
pgadmin3-0.9.0-cvs20030809.rpm
2) FTP uploads are numbered:
pgadmin3-{version}-{build}.rpm
pgadmin3-0.9.0-1.rpm
Build should be 1, 2, 3, etc...
When you release a new {version}, the {build} goes back to 1.
Agreed? On your reply, I will rebuild the packages.
Cheers, Jean-Michel
   

Sounds good to me. Not sure the cvs in the snapshot names is needed, but I don't think it hurts.
 

It's ok for me and really near from what is done on Debian, I like it 
:). Dave, the cvs information can have its importance when the package 
is found in an official distro, to distinguish the build from a fully 
"stable" one. I  found quite a lot of package versioned like that in 
debian and think it's easy to read and as you said it doesn't hurt.

Cheers,

Raphaël





---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
     joining column's datatypes do not match