> -----Original Message----- > From: Hiroshi Saito [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 10 September 2003 03:24 > To: Dave Page > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] dlgOperator_patch > > > > This is one that is not in pga2 - any ideas? > > MERGES is specified tacitly. > Default name in the preparation is put. > I don't think that it is a problem that it doesn't have > chkbox.
I think it has as much right to be there as HASHES, however whilst there is a oprcanhash column in pg_operator, there is no oprcanmerge column. So what defines a mergeable operator? > However, are LTCMP, GTCMP necessary? Yes, I think so. You can specify them when you create an operator (they are shown as < operator and > operator btw.). Regards, Dave. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
