Hi Dave. This is patch of pga3. Please Apply it.
pga2 is thought to want to adjust it tonight. Regards, Hiroshi Saito From: "Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > This is one that is not in pga2 - any ideas? > > MERGES is specified tacitly. > Default name in the preparation is put. > I don't think that it is a problem that it doesn't have > chkbox. I think it has as much right to be there as HASHES, however whilst there is a oprcanhash column in pg_operator, there is no oprcanmerge column. So what defines a mergeable operator? > However, are LTCMP, GTCMP necessary? Yes, I think so. You can specify them when you create an operator (they are shown as < operator and > operator btw.). Regards, Dave.
dlgOperator_merge_patch
Description: Binary data
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
