Le vendredi 30 octobre 2009 à 23:48:45, Tom Lane a écrit :
> Thom Brown <[email protected]> writes:
> > How is pgAdmin determining the serial type in this case?
> 
> Most likely it's looking for the pg_depend entry that shows the sequence
> as being "owned by" the column.  However, that's an oversimplification
> of reality.  I would imagine that pgAdmin will lie to you in exactly
> the same cases that used to break pg_dump (notably, where someone has
> manually adjusted either the default expression or the sequence...)
> 

I've just read this. I wasn't aware of this. Should we suppress this behavior 
of pgAdmin?


-- 
Guillaume.
 http://www.postgresqlfr.org
 http://dalibo.com

-- 
Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers

Reply via email to