On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Guillaume Lelarge <[email protected]> wrote: > Le vendredi 30 octobre 2009 à 23:48:45, Tom Lane a écrit : >> Thom Brown <[email protected]> writes: >> > How is pgAdmin determining the serial type in this case? >> >> Most likely it's looking for the pg_depend entry that shows the sequence >> as being "owned by" the column. However, that's an oversimplification >> of reality. I would imagine that pgAdmin will lie to you in exactly >> the same cases that used to break pg_dump (notably, where someone has >> manually adjusted either the default expression or the sequence...) >> > > I've just read this. I wasn't aware of this. Should we suppress this behavior > of pgAdmin?
Do you have a proposed fix? I suspect people won't want us to stop showing columns as 'SERIAL' when they actually were created that way. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com PGDay.EU 2009 Conference: http://2009.pgday.eu/start -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
