That syntax was (once) intentional, and was not a bug, as earlier versions of PG don't support ALTER SEQUENCE. Did you check the version compatibility?
-- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK:http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company > On 14 Jul 2014, at 22:03, Guillaume Lelarge <guilla...@lelarge.info> wrote: > > Fix SQL for GRANT on a sequence > > Report from liuyuanyuan. > > Branch > ------ > REL-1_18_0_PATCHES > > Details > ------- > http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin3.git;a=commitdiff;h=5eb8e16348c001708d4b2d511eae988724a84938 > > Modified Files > -------------- > CHANGELOG | 2 ++ > pgadmin/dlg/dlgSequence.cpp | 2 +- > pgadmin/schema/pgSequence.cpp | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > -- > Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
