2014-07-14 23:09 GMT+02:00 Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org>:

> That syntax was (once) intentional, and was not a bug, as earlier versions
> of PG don't support ALTER SEQUENCE. Did you check the version compatibility?
>
>
I'm not sure I understand what you mean. We're not talking about ALTER
SEQUENCE. We're talking about GRANT ON SEQUENCE.


> --
> Dave Page
> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
> Twitter: @pgsnake
>
> EnterpriseDB UK:http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
> On 14 Jul 2014, at 22:03, Guillaume Lelarge <guilla...@lelarge.info>
> wrote:
>
> Fix SQL for GRANT on a sequence
>
> Report from liuyuanyuan.
>
> Branch
> ------
> REL-1_18_0_PATCHES
>
> Details
> -------
>
> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgadmin3.git;a=commitdiff;h=5eb8e16348c001708d4b2d511eae988724a84938
>
> Modified Files
> --------------
> CHANGELOG                     |    2 ++
> pgadmin/dlg/dlgSequence.cpp   |    2 +-
> pgadmin/schema/pgSequence.cpp |    2 +-
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
>
>


-- 
Guillaume.
  http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
  http://www.dalibo.com

Reply via email to