Hi,

PFA table add-on patch version 8.3. (apply after 8.2)


--
Regards,
Murtuza Zabuawala
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Murtuza Zabuawala <
murtuza.zabuaw...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> PFA table add-on patch version 8.2
>
> --
> Regards,
> Murtuza Zabuawala
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Harshal Dhumal <
> harshal.dhu...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> PFA patch for table node (version 8.1). apply this patch on version 7
>> patch. Not all issue are fixed in this patch. Murtuza will be sending
>> version 8.2 witch will have resolution for remaining issues. Apply version
>> 8.2 patch on version 8.1
>>
>> --
>> *Harshal Dhumal*
>> *Software Engineer *
>>
>>
>>
>> EenterpriseDB <http://www.enterprisedb.com>
>>
>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 10:12 PM, Sanket Mehta <
>> sanket.me...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Harshal,
>>>
>>>
>>> Below are my review comments:
>>>
>>>  I got below warning when I tried to apply the patch for table node as
>>> mentioned below:
>>>
>>> Table creation:
>>>
>>>    -  Trailing white spaces warnings
>>>
>>>                     $ git apply
>>> /projects/patches/pgadmin4/Table/table_14_May_V6.patch
>>>
>>> /projects/patches/pgadmin4/Table/table_14_May_V6.patch:6008: trailing
>>> whitespace.
>>>                               return false;
>>>
>>>  /projects/patches/pgadmin4/Table/table_14_May_V6.patch:6016: trailing
>>> whitespace.
>>>                               return false;
>>>                    warning: 2 lines add whitespace errors.
>>>
>>
>> Fixed (These were introduced due to rules node.)
>>
>>
>>>
>>>    - In Table creation dialog, while adding a new primary key, it does
>>>    not allow to change the tablespace to empty. (which is not the case in 
>>> case
>>>    of tablespace in table)
>>>
>>> Fixed
>>
>>>
>>>    - In Table creation dialog, while adding a new column, data type and
>>>    name field must be mandatory. otherwise while clicking on save it gives
>>>    below error
>>>
>>>                   File
>>> "/projects/pgadmin4/web/pgadmin/browser/server_groups/servers/databases/schemas/tables/__init__.py",
>>> line 1319, in _parse_format_columns
>>>                    c['cltype'] = self._cltype_formatter(c['cltype'])
>>>                    KeyError: 'cltype
>>>
>> Fixed
>>
>>
>>>
>>>    - In Table creation dialog, While adding a new column, in primary
>>>    check box is needed to click twice in order to check it. Ideally it 
>>> should
>>>    be checked by only one click.
>>>
>>> This is Backgrid behaviour.
>>
>>>
>>>    - In Table creation dialog, While adding a new column, primary key
>>>    should not be allowed to added unless user has provided name and data 
>>> type
>>>    for at least one column.
>>>
>>>  Fixed
>>
>>>
>>>    - currently if user has clicked on add column button and immediately
>>>    click on add primary key button, it will add a row in primary key data 
>>> grid
>>>
>>> Fixed
>>
>>>
>>>    - When delete table/drop cascade is apply on any table, i got a
>>>    javascript error as mentioned below
>>>
>>>                  node.js:94 Uncaught TypeError: self.canDrop.apply is
>>> not a function
>>>
>> Already fixed in other commit.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>    - Once the above error generated, every time user tries to open a
>>>    context menu by right clicking on any existing table, that same error 
>>> comes
>>>
>>> Already fixed in other commit.
>>
>>>
>>>    - In table creation dialog, if table is inherited from another
>>>    table, if a new primary key is added manually there, the create sql will
>>>    not have an entry for primary key
>>>
>>> Fixed
>>
>>>
>>>    - In table creation dialog, if primary key check box is checked
>>>    while adding the row, a new row is added in primary key datagrid but
>>>    unchecking the primary key checkbox from column datagrid, does not 
>>> removes
>>>    that row from primary key data grid.
>>>
>>> Fixed.
>>
>>>
>>>    - In AutoVacuum tab, if user provides any invalid value to any
>>>    parameter, then a error message should be prompted, only background color
>>>    change would not tell user to change the value.
>>>
>>> Expected  behaviour.
>>
>>>
>>>    - In table creation dialog, security label are not being added.
>>>    javascript error is coming as mentioned below:
>>>      {"success": 0, "info": "", "result": null, "data": null,
>>>    "errormsg": "can't adapt type 'Undefined'"}
>>>
>>>  Fixed
>>
>>>
>>>    - In Table creation dialog, while adding foreign key, in action tab.
>>>    if user click on 'x' button in "on update" or "on delete" select2 
>>> control,
>>>    it gives error "Uncaught SyntaxError: Unexpected end of input"
>>>
>>> Fixed
>>
>>>
>>>    - In Table creation dialog, while adding a check constraint,
>>>    "validated" button does not work properly
>>>
>>> Fixed.
>>
>>>
>>>    - After successfully creation of table, "table name cannot be empty"
>>>    error is not getting cleared.
>>>
>>> Not reproducible.
>>
>>>
>>>    - In Table creation dialog, if user has added an empty column
>>>    without entering its name or type and trying to add check constraint, it
>>>    will add an empty constraint
>>>
>>>  Expected  behaviour (Columns are not mandatory for check constrains)
>>
>>>
>>>    - In Table creation dialog, while adding an exclude constraint, for
>>>    "character varying" column type, no operators are being listed
>>>
>>>  There are no operators for character varying data type.
>>
>>>
>>>    - In Table creation dialog, while adding an exclude constraint,
>>>    below mentioned error comes if user removes operator class by clicking 
>>> 'x'
>>>    on that control Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read property 'id' of 
>>> undefined
>>>
>>>  TODO
>>
>>>
>>>    - In Table creation dialog, SQL is not getting generated for exclude
>>>    constraint
>>>
>>> Fixed
>>
>>>
>>>    - In Table creation dialog, schema should be prefixed with table
>>>    name in "of type" control
>>>
>>>  Fixed
>>
>>>
>>>    - In Table creation dialog, while adding privileges, it always shows
>>>    default privileges even if user has selected different privileges. (This
>>>    works fine once user edit the privileges in edit table mode and shows 
>>> only
>>>    those privileges which user selects). Ashesh, please confirm the 
>>> behaviour.
>>>
>>> Privileges are set correctly. Only it shows in incorrect order.
>>
>>
>>> Table edit mode:
>>>
>>>    - If in edit mode, any constraint is already having any comment,
>>>    then remove it. It will not create the SQL for the same.
>>>
>>>
>> Fixed
>>
>>>
>>>    - Changing Schema will give server error
>>>
>>> This is generic issue for each node.
>>
>>
>>> Column Creation:
>>>
>>>    - Save button is enabled by default
>>>    - Data type validation is not provided. Save button is enabled just
>>>    after providing column name
>>>    - Length field limitation is not provided. (i.e. for numeric type,
>>>    length should be allowed greater than 1000)
>>>
>>> *Fixed*
>
>> Exclusion constraint creation:
>>>
>>>    - Access method should not be allowed to be empty. (currently by
>>>    clicking 'x' will remove the selection in it)
>>>
>>> Access method is optional.
>>
>>
>>> Index creation:
>>>
>>>    - No error message for name field when empty
>>>    - No error message when column name is not provided while adding a
>>>    column in index
>>>    - While adding a column if no name is provided, "None" appears in
>>>    SQL tab which will give error on OK button click
>>>    - when comment is provided while creation, it gives error saying
>>>    index does not exists. because schema name is not added before it.
>>>
>>> *Fixed*
>
>> Rule creation:
>>>
>>>    - Name is empty error does not come till user enters something in
>>>    definition tab
>>>    - DO INSTEAD button does not make any difference to SQL (it works in
>>>    edit mode)
>>>
>>> *Surinder will send patch*
>
>> Rule edit mode:
>>>
>>>    - Add comment in edit mode, check the SQL in sql tab. Now come back
>>>    to general tab and removes comment and check the sql tab again.
>>>    SQL for comment is still there with empty string as comment
>>>
>>> *Surinder will send patch*
>
>> Trigger Creation:
>>>
>>>    - SQL is not proper when creating a trigger. "()" should be appended
>>>    to function name in SQL.
>>>    It gives error while creating a trigger
>>>    - "+" sign is visible in browser tree in front of trigger.  either
>>>    On expanding trigger, it should show the trigger function name or that 
>>> "+"
>>>    sign should not appear
>>>
>>> *Fixed*
>
>> Trigger edit node:
>>>
>>
>>>    - On removing comment, nothing happens. No sql is being created.
>>>    Comment is still there in properties.
>>>
>>> *Fixed*
>
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Sanket Mehta
>>> Sr Software engineer
>>> Enterprisedb
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
>>
>>
>

Attachment: table_v8.3.patch
Description: Binary data

-- 
Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers

Reply via email to