Hi On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 9:42 PM, Raffi Holzer <rhol...@pivotal.io> wrote: > Hi, > As part of a project to enable pgAdmin4 to work with Greenplum databases, > we conducted user research into pgAdmin. We wanted to share those insights > and potentially develop against them but first wanted to get feedback from > the pgAdmin group. To that end we created the video below that summarizes > our findings. Let us know what you think. > > https://youtu.be/BylcblYw8sU
That's very helpful, thank you. Can you please summarise your findings in an email to the list so we can work with it within our normal process? I will note that whilst I agree some of the points raised need further work in pgAdmin 4, some of them make little sense - most notably Syntax Highlighting which we've had for ~17 years, and works automatically, thus not requiring any kind of user discovery beyond typing some SQL into the query tool. Auto-complete is another example of a feature we've had for years, that is documented. I agree though that there is scope for better discovery mechanisms there. Some of the other comments highlighted made little to no sense to me, for example the comment on column names @ ~3:03 and the comment on the bottom left @ ~3:22 (this is a great example of why email is better than a video :-) ). -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
