On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Robert Eckhardt <reckha...@pivotal.io> wrote: > One of the surprises for me when looking at the interview notes was the > number of features that people asked for that already existed. IMO one of > the wins for design would be making these more easily discovered. As I see > it a lot of the design is going to be fairly nuanced and having the > conversation to include the community in the process of discovery and > validation would be awesome if there is interest.
There is definitely interest. Improving pgAdmin helps the community, which in turn helps EDB, Pivotal and every other Postgres company that has users using it. My main concern is making the right decisions on what to change, and focussing efforts in the areas where we gain most benefit. Of course, the resources to do the work are also critical - the current team already have a good years worth of work in various additional features and improvements. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
