Hello Hackers,
We just looked into this patch and have some questions about it.
- Where is the JSON file created? Do we need to call it with some special
argument in order for it to be created?
- There is a print statement in the line 275 of runtests.py is it supposed
to be there?
- The function name addSuccess does not match the styling of the code, it
should be add_success
Suggestions:
- The definition of the class_name (run_tests.py, line 229) variable looks
the same as in the if statements below and could be extracted into a
function to avoid repeating the same code.
- In the same function when we are updating error/failure/skip test results
the code looks pretty similar and can also be extracted into a function
Thanks
Joao & Sarah
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Navnath Gadakh <
navnath.gad...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> <Ignore previous email>
>
> Please find the revised patch for test result enhancement, which
> include code to write passed test cases into the JSON file along with
> skipped and failed.
>
> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Navnath Gadakh <
> navnath.gad...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> Please find the revised patch for test result enhancement.
>>
>> What's in the patch:
>> 1. The test result summary will store in JSON file.
>> 2. Removed some redundant code from regression/test_utils.py
>> 3. Added the scenario names for feature tests.
>> 4. To print test scenario names in failed and skipped test cases, I
>> override apply_scenario() function in regression/test_utils.py
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Navnath Gadakh <
>> navnath.gad...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Akshay,
>>>
>>> Please find the revised patch for test result enhancement.
>>>
>>> *What's in the patch:*
>>> 1. The test result summary will store in JSON file.
>>> 2. Removed some redundant code from *regression/test_utils.py*
>>> *3. A*dded the scenario names for feature tests.
>>> 4. To print test scenario names in failed and skipped test cases, I o
>>> verride *apply_scenario()* function in *regression/test_utils.py*
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 6:16 PM, Akshay Joshi <
>>> akshay.jo...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Navnath
>>>>
>>>> I have run the updated patch. It is working fine with Python 2.7 but I
>>>> am facing following error with Python 3.5, can you please look into it:
>>>>
>>>> ======================================================================
>>>>
>>>> ERROR: runTest (pgadmin.feature_tests.connect_to_server_feature_test.
>>>> ConnectsToServerFeatureTest)
>>>>
>>>> Test database connection which can be created from the UI
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>
>>>> File "/Users/akshay/Development/pgadmin4/web/regression/feature_u
>>>> tils/base_feature_test.py", line 33, in setUp
>>>>
>>>> self.page.reset_layout()
>>>>
>>>> File "/Users/akshay/Development/pgadmin4/web/regression/feature_u
>>>> tils/pgadmin_page.py", line 33, in reset_layout
>>>>
>>>> self.click_modal_ok()
>>>>
>>>> File "/Users/akshay/Development/pgadmin4/web/regression/feature_u
>>>> tils/pgadmin_page.py", line 38, in click_modal_ok
>>>>
>>>> self.click_element(self.find_by_xpath("//button[contains(.,'
>>>> OK')]"))
>>>>
>>>> File "/Users/akshay/Development/pgadmin4/web/regression/feature_u
>>>> tils/pgadmin_page.py", line 71, in find_by_xpath
>>>>
>>>> return self.wait_for_element(lambda driver: driver.
>>>> find_element_by_xpath(xpath))
>>>>
>>>> File "/Users/akshay/Development/pgadmin4/web/regression/feature_u
>>>> tils/pgadmin_page.py", line 128, in wait_for_element
>>>>
>>>> return self._wait_for("element to exist", element_if_it_exists)
>>>>
>>>> File "/Users/akshay/Development/pgadmin4/web/regression/feature_u
>>>> tils/pgadmin_page.py", line 162, in _wait_for
>>>>
>>>> "Timed out waiting for " + waiting_for_message)
>>>>
>>>> File "/Users/akshay/Development/Workspace/lib/python3.5/site-pack
>>>> ages/selenium/webdriver/support/wait.py", line 80, in until
>>>>
>>>> raise TimeoutException(message, screen, stacktrace)
>>>>
>>>> selenium.common.exceptions.TimeoutException: Message: Timed out
>>>> waiting for element to exist
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ======================================================================
>>>>
>>>> ERROR: runTest (pgadmin.feature_tests.table_ddl_feature_test.
>>>> TableDdlFeatureTest)
>>>>
>>>> Test scenarios for acceptance tests
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>
>>>> File "/Users/akshay/Development/pgadmin4/web/regression/feature_u
>>>> tils/base_feature_test.py", line 33, in setUp
>>>>
>>>> self.page.reset_layout()
>>>>
>>>> File "/Users/akshay/Development/pgadmin4/web/regression/feature_u
>>>> tils/pgadmin_page.py", line 31, in reset_layout
>>>>
>>>> self.click_element(self.find_by_partial_link_text("File"))
>>>>
>>>> File "/Users/akshay/Development/pgadmin4/web/regression/feature_u
>>>> tils/pgadmin_page.py", line 90, in click_element
>>>>
>>>> return self._wait_for("clicking the element not to throw an
>>>> exception", click_succeeded)
>>>>
>>>> File "/Users/akshay/Development/pgadmin4/web/regression/feature_u
>>>> tils/pgadmin_page.py", line 162, in _wait_for
>>>>
>>>> "Timed out waiting for " + waiting_for_message)
>>>>
>>>> File "/Users/akshay/Development/Workspace/lib/python3.5/site-pack
>>>> ages/selenium/webdriver/support/wait.py", line 80, in until
>>>>
>>>> raise TimeoutException(message, screen, stacktrace)
>>>>
>>>> selenium.common.exceptions.TimeoutException: Message: Timed out
>>>> waiting for clicking the element not to throw an exception
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Ran 153 tests in 45.493s
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> FAILED (errors=2, skipped=16)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ======================================================================
>>>>
>>>> Test Result Summary
>>>>
>>>> ======================================================================
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>
>>>> File "runtests.py", line 354, in <module>
>>>>
>>>> skipped_cases)
>>>>
>>>> File "/Users/akshay/Development/pgadmin4/web/regression/python_te
>>>> st_utils/test_utils.py", line 442, in get_scenario_name
>>>>
>>>> key, value = case_name_dict.items()[0]
>>>>
>>>> TypeError: 'dict_items' object does not support indexing
>>>>
>>>> Resolved.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 8:04 PM, Navnath Gadakh <
>>>> navnath.gad...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>>>
>>>>> Please find the revised patch for test result enhancement.
>>>>>
>>>>> *What's in the patch:*
>>>>> 1. The test result summary will store in JSON file.
>>>>> 2. Removed some redundant code from *regression/test_utils.py*
>>>>> *3. A*dded the scenario names for feature tests.
>>>>> 4. To print test scenario names in failed and skipped test cases, I o
>>>>> verride *apply_scenario()* function in *regression/test_utils.py*
>>>>>
>>>>> I have also attached the sample JSON file with the test result as per
>>>>> your suggestions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 6:03 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:12 AM, Navnath Gadakh
>>>>>> <navnath.gad...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>>>>> > Hi,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Hi
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:15 AM, Navnath Gadakh
>>>>>> >> <navnath.gad...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >> > Hello Dave,
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> Hi
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Navnath Gadakh
>>>>>> >> >> <navnath.gad...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>> >> >> >> When running with the patch:
>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> >> 1) The browser isn't closed, and the script never exits - it
>>>>>> just
>>>>>> >> >> >> sits
>>>>>> >> >> >> indefinitely at:
>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> >> =====
>>>>>> >> >> >> Please check output in file:
>>>>>> >> >> >> /Users/dpage/git/pgadmin4/web/regression/regression.log
>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> >> make: *** [check] Error 1
>>>>>> >> >> >> =====
>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> >> without returning to a shell prompt. The browser exits when
>>>>>> I hit
>>>>>> >> >> >> Ctrl+C.
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> The above is still a problem. In fact, not only do I have to hit
>>>>>> >> >> Ctrl+C, but then the browser prompts me to check I really do
>>>>>> want to
>>>>>> >> >> exit.
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> There's also another problem that just showed up. I got the
>>>>>> following
>>>>>> >> >> failure on PG 9.4 (due to a known intermittent bug that Ashesh
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> >> >> Tira@Pivotal are working on). Note how it's not reported in the
>>>>>> >> >> summary (or the JSON output):
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > I found the issue, In the feature tests we need to add a
>>>>>> scenario name
>>>>>> >> > for
>>>>>> >> > each test case. the purpose of this patch is to print the
>>>>>> failed/skipped
>>>>>> >> > test class name with the scenario name like:
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > 152 tests passed
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > 1 test failed:
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > LoginRoleGetTestCase (Check Role Node)
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > 16 tests skipped:
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > SynonymGetTestCase (Fetch synonym Node URL)
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > But our in-built test framework does not provide that scenario
>>>>>> name with
>>>>>> >> > failed/skipped test case that's why I override apply_scenario()
>>>>>> >> > function.
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > def apply_scenario(scenario, test):
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > name, parameters = scenario
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > parameters["scenario_name"] = name
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > While printing the result, I have checked the if 'scenario_name'
>>>>>> in test
>>>>>> >> > as
>>>>>> >> > we need to print scenario name in test summary as well as in
>>>>>> JSON file.
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > I can do it without scenario name but for better understanding
>>>>>> which
>>>>>> >> > test
>>>>>> >> > scenario is failed it's good to add a scenario name with each
>>>>>> test case.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> OK.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> > See this is how test cases looks like while printing on console
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > API:
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > runTest
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > (pgadmin.browser.server_groups.servers.databases.schemas.typ
>>>>>> es.tests.test_types_put.TypesUpdateTestCase)
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > Update type under schema node ... ok
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > Feature tests:
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > runTest
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > (pgadmin.utils.tests.test_versioned_template_loader.TestVers
>>>>>> ionedTemplateLoader)
>>>>>> >> > ... ok
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > No scenario name in feature tests.
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> OK, is that easy to fix while you're at it?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I have two solutions-
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > 1. Need a little hack to skip scenario/test name if that does not
>>>>>> exist, but
>>>>>> > that's not the best idea.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > 2. Owner of feature tests should add scenario/test name to each
>>>>>> feature
>>>>>> > test. In the summary also we will know for which scenario test is
>>>>>> failing or
>>>>>> > skipping.
>>>>>> > This is ideal and long term solution and I prefer it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Agreed - and as there are only 2 feature tests, you should be able to
>>>>>> fix them up pretty quickly :-p
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Once code is in the repo, it's "ours", meaning the entire communities.
>>>>>> I wouldn't expect us to ping all issues back to Pivotal - we're one
>>>>>> team on this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Dave Page
>>>>>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>>>>>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>>>>>
>>>>>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>>>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Navnath Gadakh
>>>>>
>>>>> EnterpriseDB Corporation
>>>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org)
>>>>> To make changes to your subscription:
>>>>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> *Akshay Joshi*
>>>> *Principal Software Engineer *
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Phone: +91 20-3058-9517 <+91%2020%203058%209517>Mobile: +91
>>>> 976-788-8246 <+91%2097678%2088246>*
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Navnath Gadakh
>>>
>>> EnterpriseDB Corporation
>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Navnath Gadakh
>>
>> EnterpriseDB Corporation
>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Navnath Gadakh
>
> EnterpriseDB Corporation
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
>
>
