Hello Joao,
Thanks for review and suggestions.
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 9:08 PM, Joao Pedro De Almeida Pereira <
jdealmeidapere...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> Hello Hackers,
> We just looked into this patch and have some questions about it.
>
> - Where is the JSON file created? Do we need to call it with some special
> argument in order for it to be created?
>
This file is created under* /regression/ *directory (*runtests.py*, line
401). No need to call any special argument.
> - There is a print statement in the line 275 of runtests.py is it supposed
> to be there?
>
Removed.
> - The function name addSuccess does not match the styling of the code, it
> should be add_success
>
Done.
> Suggestions:
> - The definition of the class_name (run_tests.py, line 229) variable looks
> the same as in the if statements below and could be extracted into a
> function to avoid repeating the same code.
>
Done.
> - In the same function when we are updating error/failure/skip test
> results the code looks pretty similar and can also be extracted into a
> function
>
Done.
@Dave, Please find the attached patch with necessary code changes. I have
also added missing scenario names to some test cases.
Thanks.
>
> Thanks
> Joao & Sarah
>
> On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Navnath Gadakh <
> navnath.gad...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Dave,
>> <Ignore previous email>
>>
>> Please find the revised patch for test result enhancement,
>> which include code to write passed test cases into the JSON file along with
>> skipped and failed.
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Navnath Gadakh <
>> navnath.gad...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Dave,
>>>
>>> Please find the revised patch for test result enhancement.
>>>
>>> What's in the patch:
>>> 1. The test result summary will store in JSON file.
>>> 2. Removed some redundant code from regression/test_utils.py
>>> 3. Added the scenario names for feature tests.
>>> 4. To print test scenario names in failed and skipped test cases, I
>>> override apply_scenario() function in regression/test_utils.py
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Navnath Gadakh <
>>> navnath.gad...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Akshay,
>>>>
>>>> Please find the revised patch for test result enhancement.
>>>>
>>>> *What's in the patch:*
>>>> 1. The test result summary will store in JSON file.
>>>> 2. Removed some redundant code from *regression/test_utils.py*
>>>> *3. A*dded the scenario names for feature tests.
>>>> 4. To print test scenario names in failed and skipped test cases, I o
>>>> verride *apply_scenario()* function in *regression/test_utils.py*
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 6:16 PM, Akshay Joshi <
>>>> akshay.jo...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Navnath
>>>>>
>>>>> I have run the updated patch. It is working fine with Python 2.7 but I
>>>>> am facing following error with Python 3.5, can you please look into it:
>>>>>
>>>>> ======================================================================
>>>>>
>>>>> ERROR: runTest (pgadmin.feature_tests.connect_to_server_feature_test.
>>>>> ConnectsToServerFeatureTest)
>>>>>
>>>>> Test database connection which can be created from the UI
>>>>>
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>>
>>>>> File "/Users/akshay/Development/pgadmin4/web/regression/feature_u
>>>>> tils/base_feature_test.py", line 33, in setUp
>>>>>
>>>>> self.page.reset_layout()
>>>>>
>>>>> File "/Users/akshay/Development/pgadmin4/web/regression/feature_u
>>>>> tils/pgadmin_page.py", line 33, in reset_layout
>>>>>
>>>>> self.click_modal_ok()
>>>>>
>>>>> File "/Users/akshay/Development/pgadmin4/web/regression/feature_u
>>>>> tils/pgadmin_page.py", line 38, in click_modal_ok
>>>>>
>>>>> self.click_element(self.find_by_xpath("//button[contains(.,'
>>>>> OK')]"))
>>>>>
>>>>> File "/Users/akshay/Development/pgadmin4/web/regression/feature_u
>>>>> tils/pgadmin_page.py", line 71, in find_by_xpath
>>>>>
>>>>> return self.wait_for_element(lambda driver: driver.
>>>>> find_element_by_xpath(xpath))
>>>>>
>>>>> File "/Users/akshay/Development/pgadmin4/web/regression/feature_u
>>>>> tils/pgadmin_page.py", line 128, in wait_for_element
>>>>>
>>>>> return self._wait_for("element to exist", element_if_it_exists)
>>>>>
>>>>> File "/Users/akshay/Development/pgadmin4/web/regression/feature_u
>>>>> tils/pgadmin_page.py", line 162, in _wait_for
>>>>>
>>>>> "Timed out waiting for " + waiting_for_message)
>>>>>
>>>>> File "/Users/akshay/Development/Workspace/lib/python3.5/site-pack
>>>>> ages/selenium/webdriver/support/wait.py", line 80, in until
>>>>>
>>>>> raise TimeoutException(message, screen, stacktrace)
>>>>>
>>>>> selenium.common.exceptions.TimeoutException: Message: Timed out
>>>>> waiting for element to exist
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ======================================================================
>>>>>
>>>>> ERROR: runTest (pgadmin.feature_tests.table_ddl_feature_test.
>>>>> TableDdlFeatureTest)
>>>>>
>>>>> Test scenarios for acceptance tests
>>>>>
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>>
>>>>> File "/Users/akshay/Development/pgadmin4/web/regression/feature_u
>>>>> tils/base_feature_test.py", line 33, in setUp
>>>>>
>>>>> self.page.reset_layout()
>>>>>
>>>>> File "/Users/akshay/Development/pgadmin4/web/regression/feature_u
>>>>> tils/pgadmin_page.py", line 31, in reset_layout
>>>>>
>>>>> self.click_element(self.find_by_partial_link_text("File"))
>>>>>
>>>>> File "/Users/akshay/Development/pgadmin4/web/regression/feature_u
>>>>> tils/pgadmin_page.py", line 90, in click_element
>>>>>
>>>>> return self._wait_for("clicking the element not to throw an
>>>>> exception", click_succeeded)
>>>>>
>>>>> File "/Users/akshay/Development/pgadmin4/web/regression/feature_u
>>>>> tils/pgadmin_page.py", line 162, in _wait_for
>>>>>
>>>>> "Timed out waiting for " + waiting_for_message)
>>>>>
>>>>> File "/Users/akshay/Development/Workspace/lib/python3.5/site-pack
>>>>> ages/selenium/webdriver/support/wait.py", line 80, in until
>>>>>
>>>>> raise TimeoutException(message, screen, stacktrace)
>>>>>
>>>>> selenium.common.exceptions.TimeoutException: Message: Timed out
>>>>> waiting for clicking the element not to throw an exception
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Ran 153 tests in 45.493s
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> FAILED (errors=2, skipped=16)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ======================================================================
>>>>>
>>>>> Test Result Summary
>>>>>
>>>>> ======================================================================
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>>
>>>>> File "runtests.py", line 354, in <module>
>>>>>
>>>>> skipped_cases)
>>>>>
>>>>> File "/Users/akshay/Development/pgadmin4/web/regression/python_te
>>>>> st_utils/test_utils.py", line 442, in get_scenario_name
>>>>>
>>>>> key, value = case_name_dict.items()[0]
>>>>>
>>>>> TypeError: 'dict_items' object does not support indexing
>>>>>
>>>>> Resolved.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 8:04 PM, Navnath Gadakh <
>>>>> navnath.gad...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please find the revised patch for test result enhancement.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *What's in the patch:*
>>>>>> 1. The test result summary will store in JSON file.
>>>>>> 2. Removed some redundant code from *regression/test_utils.py*
>>>>>> *3. A*dded the scenario names for feature tests.
>>>>>> 4. To print test scenario names in failed and skipped test cases, I o
>>>>>> verride *apply_scenario()* function in *regression/test_utils.py*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have also attached the sample JSON file with the test result as per
>>>>>> your suggestions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 6:03 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:12 AM, Navnath Gadakh
>>>>>>> <navnath.gad...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> > Hi,
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Hi
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:15 AM, Navnath Gadakh
>>>>>>> >> <navnath.gad...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> >> > Hello Dave,
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Dave Page <dp...@pgadmin.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>> >> >> Hi
>>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>> >> >> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Navnath Gadakh
>>>>>>> >> >> <navnath.gad...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>>> >> >> >> When running with the patch:
>>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>>> >> >> >> 1) The browser isn't closed, and the script never exits -
>>>>>>> it just
>>>>>>> >> >> >> sits
>>>>>>> >> >> >> indefinitely at:
>>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>>> >> >> >> =====
>>>>>>> >> >> >> Please check output in file:
>>>>>>> >> >> >> /Users/dpage/git/pgadmin4/web/regression/regression.log
>>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>>> >> >> >> make: *** [check] Error 1
>>>>>>> >> >> >> =====
>>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>>> >> >> >> without returning to a shell prompt. The browser exits
>>>>>>> when I hit
>>>>>>> >> >> >> Ctrl+C.
>>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>> >> >> The above is still a problem. In fact, not only do I have to
>>>>>>> hit
>>>>>>> >> >> Ctrl+C, but then the browser prompts me to check I really do
>>>>>>> want to
>>>>>>> >> >> exit.
>>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>>> >> >> There's also another problem that just showed up. I got the
>>>>>>> following
>>>>>>> >> >> failure on PG 9.4 (due to a known intermittent bug that Ashesh
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> >> >> Tira@Pivotal are working on). Note how it's not reported in
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> >> >> summary (or the JSON output):
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > I found the issue, In the feature tests we need to add a
>>>>>>> scenario name
>>>>>>> >> > for
>>>>>>> >> > each test case. the purpose of this patch is to print the
>>>>>>> failed/skipped
>>>>>>> >> > test class name with the scenario name like:
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > 152 tests passed
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > 1 test failed:
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > LoginRoleGetTestCase (Check Role Node)
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > 16 tests skipped:
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > SynonymGetTestCase (Fetch synonym Node URL)
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > But our in-built test framework does not provide that scenario
>>>>>>> name with
>>>>>>> >> > failed/skipped test case that's why I override apply_scenario()
>>>>>>> >> > function.
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > def apply_scenario(scenario, test):
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > name, parameters = scenario
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > parameters["scenario_name"] = name
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > While printing the result, I have checked the if
>>>>>>> 'scenario_name' in test
>>>>>>> >> > as
>>>>>>> >> > we need to print scenario name in test summary as well as in
>>>>>>> JSON file.
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > I can do it without scenario name but for better understanding
>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>> >> > test
>>>>>>> >> > scenario is failed it's good to add a scenario name with each
>>>>>>> test case.
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> OK.
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> > See this is how test cases looks like while printing on console
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > API:
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > runTest
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > (pgadmin.browser.server_groups.servers.databases.schemas.typ
>>>>>>> es.tests.test_types_put.TypesUpdateTestCase)
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > Update type under schema node ... ok
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > Feature tests:
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > runTest
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > (pgadmin.utils.tests.test_versioned_template_loader.TestVers
>>>>>>> ionedTemplateLoader)
>>>>>>> >> > ... ok
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >> > No scenario name in feature tests.
>>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> OK, is that easy to fix while you're at it?
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > I have two solutions-
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > 1. Need a little hack to skip scenario/test name if that does not
>>>>>>> exist, but
>>>>>>> > that's not the best idea.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > 2. Owner of feature tests should add scenario/test name to each
>>>>>>> feature
>>>>>>> > test. In the summary also we will know for which scenario test is
>>>>>>> failing or
>>>>>>> > skipping.
>>>>>>> > This is ideal and long term solution and I prefer it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Agreed - and as there are only 2 feature tests, you should be able to
>>>>>>> fix them up pretty quickly :-p
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Once code is in the repo, it's "ours", meaning the entire
>>>>>>> communities.
>>>>>>> I wouldn't expect us to ping all issues back to Pivotal - we're one
>>>>>>> team on this.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Dave Page
>>>>>>> Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
>>>>>>> Twitter: @pgsnake
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>>>>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Navnath Gadakh
>>>>>>
>>>>>> EnterpriseDB Corporation
>>>>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org
>>>>>> )
>>>>>> To make changes to your subscription:
>>>>>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> *Akshay Joshi*
>>>>> *Principal Software Engineer *
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Phone: +91 20-3058-9517 <+91%2020%203058%209517>Mobile: +91
>>>>> 976-788-8246 <+91%2097678%2088246>*
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Navnath Gadakh
>>>>
>>>> EnterpriseDB Corporation
>>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Navnath Gadakh
>>>
>>> EnterpriseDB Corporation
>>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Navnath Gadakh
>>
>> EnterpriseDB Corporation
>> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
>>
>>
>
--
Regards,
Navnath Gadakh
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
tests_result_enhancement_v5.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgadmin-hackers mailing list (pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-hackers
