On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Guillaume Lelarge <guilla...@lelarge.info> wrote: > Le 19/01/2011 22:33, Dave Page a écrit : > >> Plus, it's just one of many replication engines. >> > > This isn't a good reason to me. I would like to see something alike for SR.
My point is, why should we support one external replication engine over another? Originally, it was because Slony was the only one worth considering, but that really isn't the case any more. I think SR is a different case - it's part of PostgreSQL, so certainly should be supported as makes sense. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgadmin-support mailing list (pgadmin-support@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-support
