Ah you're correct, the output from cvs is a lot cleaner. But there's still a few left, I'm guessing the ACL_OBJECT* ones are the result of a missing default case, and hoping the others are pretty meaningless. I never been a fan of not resolving warnings, it makes it harder to see real issues, but I guess some compilers might not be showing them...
http://privatepaste.com/2da30bdf07 --- On Thu, 14/1/10, Xavier Noguer <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Xavier Noguer <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Pgpool-general] Warnings in later pgpool-II versions > To: "Glyn Astill" <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Date: Thursday, 14 January, 2010, 14:38 > > Most of those warnings have already been fixed in cvs by > Tatsuo. You > should try checking out the latest version from cvs. > > > Regards > > On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 14:13 +0000, Glyn Astill wrote: > > Hi people, > > > > Bar the usual bison ones, I've noticed the list of > compile time warnings getting lager in later pgpool ii > versions (i.e. 2.2.6 and 2.3.1) are these known and > acknowledged as ok to ignore, or is it just me? > > > > http://privatepaste.com/706c465f36 > > > > Thanks > > Glyn > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Pgpool-general mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-general > > _______________________________________________ Pgpool-general mailing list [email protected] http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-general
