The file is used for parallel queries.
The missing cases are for rewriting GRANT statement. Unfortunately I
have no time to fix it and add nasty pool_log to suppress compiler
warnings.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan

> Ah you're correct, the output from cvs is a lot cleaner. But there's still a 
> few left, I'm guessing the ACL_OBJECT* ones are the result of a missing 
> default case, and hoping the others are pretty meaningless. I never been a 
> fan of not resolving warnings, it makes it harder to see real issues, but I 
> guess some compilers might not be showing them...
> 
> http://privatepaste.com/2da30bdf07
> 
> 
> 
> --- On Thu, 14/1/10, Xavier Noguer <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > From: Xavier Noguer <[email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: [Pgpool-general] Warnings in later pgpool-II versions
> > To: "Glyn Astill" <[email protected]>
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Date: Thursday, 14 January, 2010, 14:38
> > 
> >  Most of those warnings have already been fixed in cvs by
> > Tatsuo. You
> > should try checking out the latest version from cvs.
> > 
> > 
> >  Regards
> > 
> > On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 14:13 +0000, Glyn Astill wrote:
> > > Hi people,
> > > 
> > > Bar the usual bison ones, I've noticed the list of
> > compile time warnings getting lager in later pgpool ii
> > versions (i.e. 2.2.6 and 2.3.1) are these known and
> > acknowledged as ok to ignore, or is it just me?
> > > 
> > > http://privatepaste.com/706c465f36
> > > 
> > > Thanks
> > > Glyn
> > > 
> > > 
> > >       
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Pgpool-general mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-general
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
>       
> _______________________________________________
> Pgpool-general mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-general
_______________________________________________
Pgpool-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-general

Reply via email to