Le 21/01/2011 08:07, Tatsuo Ishii a écrit : > 1) There seems to be a window between pcp_promote_node and subsequent > pcp_recovery_node calls. Do you have any idea that is safe or not? In all tests I've done, it just works perfectly. I just have to valid that against nodes load.
> 2) Your opinion that the node to be promoted should be chosen by more > intelligent rules(for example, the least lagging node), rather than > just the physical position in the configuration file seems to be > valid IMO. I wonder if we could implment automatic failover which > is based on the rule, rather than manually promoting a node by > using pcp_promote_node. Any idea? Oh yes, of course this is why I'm doing the work. The pcp_promote_node command is just here for starting the work and manually promote a node for testing purpose :-) -- Gilles Darold http://dalibo.com - http://dalibo.org _______________________________________________ Pgpool-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-hackers
