>> 1) There seems to be a window between pcp_promote_node and subsequent >> pcp_recovery_node calls. Do you have any idea that is safe or not? > In all tests I've done, it just works perfectly. I just have to valid > that against nodes load.
Great. Probably promoting a standby node and in the same time shutting down other standby nodes is most important and there should be no window there. >> 2) Your opinion that the node to be promoted should be chosen by more >> intelligent rules(for example, the least lagging node), rather than >> just the physical position in the configuration file seems to be >> valid IMO. I wonder if we could implment automatic failover which >> is based on the rule, rather than manually promoting a node by >> using pcp_promote_node. Any idea? > Oh yes, of course this is why I'm doing the work. The pcp_promote_node > command is just here for starting the work and manually promote a node > for testing purpose :-) Oh ok. Sounds great! -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp _______________________________________________ Pgpool-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/pgpool-hackers
