On December 16, 2017 5:31:01 PM PST, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: >> I'm not quite following. Could you check if the same happens without >> -O2? Not because that'd be a solution, but to narrow down how this >> happens? > >The committed test looks quite broken to me: it's missing some & >operators. Not sure how that translates into failing to fail the >configure test,
Hm, true. As you say, it doesn't explain the problem though, it's just weird int to ptr cases. Kinda seems like clang links to a different runtime during the configure tests than what's used for postgres... Andres Andres -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
