On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes: >> ... Please note that if you added >> a volatile cast to "result" as well, then compilation was able to >> complete and regression tests passed... > > Yeah, that squares with my analysis: the problem with the existing test > is that the compiler is throwing away the function call because its > output is unused. > > If I haven't seen something from Andres shortly, I'll push a fix.
And the buildfarm is happy again. Thanks for the fix. -- Michael
