On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 2:44 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > After trying it (against yesterday's sources) on my SELinux-capable > machine, I see no evidence that we need any output ordering changes > at all if we go this route. This is probably unsurprising considering > that the old btree code used to provide mostly-reverse-insertion-order > scan order.
That's good. I'm trying to fix it by hand right now, in the way that Andres suggested. It is both tedious and error-prone. -- Peter Geoghegan
