On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 8:17 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Actually, I'm not sure why it would be fine to revert 7d3bf73ac now. > > Might the problem actually be the order in which OIDs are originally > > assigned, or something like that? > > No, because then things would have been unstable before, no?
Perhaps. The cost of being wrong here is trivial anyway. I have reverted 7d3bf73ac based on the assumption that it's now unnecessary. > I actually think that we should remove most or all of the > cascade-drop-hiding hacks that are in the regression tests now, > not only that one. They should not be necessary any more, and > they might be hiding things we need to know about, now or in > the future. But I haven't got round to it. Seems like a useful goal. -- Peter Geoghegan
